Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vasil protocol parameters / genesis configuration #2779

Closed
KtorZ opened this issue May 11, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Vasil protocol parameters / genesis configuration #2779

KtorZ opened this issue May 11, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@KtorZ
Copy link
Contributor

KtorZ commented May 11, 2022

Will there be any new / altered protocol parameters or genesis configuration for the upcoming Vasil hard-fork (talking about parameters themselves / their semantic here, not about a change in their values)?

Should there be any, would it be possible to document them as a CIP before the hard-fork is actually submitted to the network, in a similar fashion to what was done for Alonzo's parameters?

Thanks a lot 🙏

@JaredCorduan
Copy link
Contributor

JaredCorduan commented May 12, 2022

The Babbage era does not introduce any new protocol parameters (so, in particular, there is no Babbage config). There is one small semantic change which will need to be accounted for in the HFC translation from Alonzo, namely coinsPerUTxOWord is changing to represent lovelace per byte (not word). Does this merit a CIP?

(Edit: I just checked, we haven't actually made this change yet, the semantics are still tied to 8 bytes, but I think we still want to change this...)

@KtorZ
Copy link
Contributor Author

KtorZ commented May 13, 2022

Thanks @JaredCorduan 👍

Does this merit a CIP?

Arguably yes, we want a CIP for all era parameters changes; though if that's the only change it can be very short :)
Shall I keep this issue open as a "reminder" and close it once we've got the CIP out, Kevin is usually doing this so that may already be on his TODO list.

@JaredCorduan
Copy link
Contributor

yea, let's keep it open, I'm excited to get the chance to embrace the CIP process more myself. thanks for opening this!

@KtorZ
Copy link
Contributor Author

KtorZ commented May 13, 2022

(for the record, related previous CIPs)

https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/tree/master/CIP-0009#readme

https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/tree/master/CIP-0028#readme

@JaredCorduan
Copy link
Contributor

cardano-foundation/CIPs#265

@JaredCorduan
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to close this issue here since I have a PR up for the CIP.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants