Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

tx-generator: the troublesome implicitness of inputs and outputs -- design #3579

Closed
deepfire opened this issue Feb 9, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

tx-generator: the troublesome implicitness of inputs and outputs -- design #3579

deepfire opened this issue Feb 9, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
@MarcFontaine

Comments

@deepfire
Copy link
Contributor

deepfire commented Feb 9, 2022

No description provided.

@MarcFontaine MarcFontaine moved this from Todo to In Progress in Performance & Tracing Feb 10, 2022
@deepfire deepfire changed the title tx-generator: the troublesome implicitness of inputs and outputs tx-generator: the troublesome implicitness of inputs and outputs -- design Feb 14, 2022
@deepfire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Concern of debuggability suggests using distinct addresses for all intermediate sets of transactions -- which seems to imply the HD derivation scheme, since we'd like to maintain the single-key-owns-all-txgen-funds model.

@MarcFontaine
Copy link
Contributor

The tx-generator is extended to use multiple/named wallets.
A dedicated wallet can be used for each Set of UTxOs that is used in a specific way,
for example in a specific benchmarking run or a specific splitting phase.

#3638

@MarcFontaine MarcFontaine moved this from In Progress to In Review in Performance & Tracing Mar 4, 2022
@MarcFontaine MarcFontaine moved this from In Review to Done in Performance & Tracing Mar 14, 2022
@Jimbo4350
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this. If this is still relevant please reopen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@MarcFontaine MarcFontaine

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@deepfire @MarcFontaine @Jimbo4350