Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discrepancy in Information Retrieval for CN106056591B Between SearXNG and Perplexica #433

Open
120L020910fanshuo opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@120L020910fanshuo
Copy link

Hello, I found an issue. When I opened 4000:8000 and searched for CN106056591B using SearXNG, I received some relevant information. However, when I requested an introduction to CN106056591B in Perplexica, the response contained incorrect information. What's going on?
The following images show the results returned by SearXNG and Perplexica, respectively.
image
image
The former is correct: 'A method for urban density estimation by fusing spectral images and lidar data.' The latter is incorrect: 'A method for determining the optimal number of clusters in data clustering.' Why didn't Perplexica generate an answer based on the results obtained from SearXNG?

@120L020910fanshuo 120L020910fanshuo added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 24, 2024
@120L020910fanshuo
Copy link
Author

Can someone give me some suggestions?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant