We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
it is a little bit frustrating
because I cannot find in the documentation for record linkage any explicit way to solve this
though seemingly it would be a very commonplace problem
i.e. missing values (empty string, NaN, etc) being marked as if they are positive matches when in reality they should be given a score of zero.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
thank you @perryvais and @imad3v for your great work!
Sorry, something went wrong.
and @tknuth @mayerantoine also!!
Hello, I have the same issue : NaN comparison generates scores equal to one. Thanks for this toolkit!
Isn't this done with the missing_value argument? E.g.
missing_value
compare_cl.numeric("a_name", "b_name", label="name", missing_value=1)
No branches or pull requests
it is a little bit frustrating
because I cannot find in the documentation for record linkage any explicit way to solve this
though seemingly it would be a very commonplace problem
i.e. missing values (empty string, NaN, etc) being marked as if they are positive matches when in reality they should be given a score of zero.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: