-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Biblatex dates like "19uu" not saved. #3483
Comments
There is also an issue for planning the support/integrity check of all dates #2753 |
For the moment we need to decouple the date picker from the field |
I looked into the code and the problem is that there is a StringConverter, which tries to convert to a date or TemporalAcessor. Of course for the above kind of dates this is not possible and therefore results in null
|
So as soon as #2753 is implemented, this should work automatically, right? I remove this from the 4.1 milestone as a fix seems to be a longer story. |
Could we as a workaround just return the original date if parsing was not successful? |
This issue has been inactive for half a year. Since JabRef is constantly evolving this issue may not be relevant any longer and it will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. As part of an effort to ensure that the JabRef team is focusing on important and valid issues, we would like to ask if you could update the issue if it still persists. This could be in the following form:
Thank you for your contribution! |
This is so great how to take care of Issues. Ignore them for months and then let them close by a bot. |
JabRef 4.1-dev--snapshot--2017-12-03--master--56aa71671
Linux 4.10.0-40-generic amd64
Java 1.8.0_151
The "Date" field will not accept a Biblatex-legal date of the form "19uu". One can enter the date, but on moving the cursor to another field, the date is erased.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: