You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2023. It is now read-only.
Tentative publication date : Friday April 8 (a week before the post about the release of version 3.3).
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
A faster JabRef is coming!
Some users reported JabRef was slow on large databases (thank you for the feedback!). This was especially the case for three operations:
loading a database
saving a database
searching through a database.
During a search, the user interface could become very unresponsive, which is indeed quite annoying... Well, this time will be over soon: @simonharrer has recently contributed code making search much faster (JabRef/jabref#1100). By integrating the Java Microbenchmarking framework (JabRef/jabref#1103), @tobiasdiez was able to benchmark JabRef and reveal interesting insights about the performance of JabRef:
Preliminary tests have been carried out on a database with 100000 entries (is it big enough for you?). They show that JabRef is now 10 times faster at searching: it takes only one second to search through 60000 entries.
Following JabRef/jabref#1100 , I figure out this is a more suitable place for a discussion.
Please, review (facts and writing) at PR #37.
Tentative publication date : Friday April 8 (a week before the post about the release of version 3.3).
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
A faster JabRef is coming!
Some users reported JabRef was slow on large databases (thank you for the feedback!). This was especially the case for three operations:
During a search, the user interface could become very unresponsive, which is indeed quite annoying... Well, this time will be over soon: @simonharrer has recently contributed code making search much faster (JabRef/jabref#1100). By integrating the Java Microbenchmarking framework (JabRef/jabref#1103), @tobiasdiez was able to benchmark JabRef and reveal interesting insights about the performance of JabRef:
Preliminary tests have been carried out on a database with 100000 entries (is it big enough for you?). They show that JabRef is now 10 times faster at searching: it takes only one second to search through 60000 entries.
If you want to give it a try: http://builds.jabref.org/master/ (this is a development version. So, be carefully, and back up your data!). Your comments are welcomed at JabRef/jabref#1100
About opening large databases: work is under way to speed it up You can follow this development at JabRef/jabref#1094
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: