Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consideration of adding a option to encode with avif svt-av1-psy #70

Open
NeinOclock opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@NeinOclock
Copy link

Feature Description

A option to select between aomenc or svt-av1-psy as a encoder for avif

Technical Details

Tune 4 was added recently to svt-av1-psy which seems to improve quality for images, there is a data set done by g82 wich show a improvement over libavif aom and jxl in the low to mediun quality while using a faster preset (svt psy s4, aomenc s4, jxl -e10)
https://svt-av1-psy.com/avif/
dataset

Existing Implementations

https://github.com/gianni-rosato/libavif

@JacobDev1 JacobDev1 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 24, 2024
@gianni-rosato
Copy link

Hi, I'm the lead maintainer of SVT-AV1-PSY & I maintain the libavif fork developed with special considerations for our encoder. If you are interested in implementing our encoder & you have any questions about implementation, let me know!

@JacobDev1
Copy link
Owner

I'll look into it.

@gianni-rosato Great, I may have some questions when I start integrating your encoder. If that's okay, I'll email you at the address you listed on your GitHub profile. My email is: contact@codepoems.eu thanks

@gianni-rosato
Copy link

Sure thing, sounds good! Feel free to reach out via any of my socials linked on my profile page on GitHub - I usually default to Matrix but email works fine for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants