Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Names of Sets #3933

Open
NoahCardoso opened this issue Aug 21, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Names of Sets #3933

NoahCardoso opened this issue Aug 21, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@NoahCardoso
Copy link
Collaborator

image
The first name is probably better but we probably don't want to use the UID for printing. As @JacquesCarette mentioned in #3878 We have different ways of associating names to chunks, and we might want to use a different one here (UID was definitely wrong, symbol is better for sure, but maybe shortname would be better still)

Would it be better to use shortname?

@balacij
Copy link
Collaborator

balacij commented Aug 21, 2024

Sorry, can you please explain a bit more @NoahCardoso ?

@NoahCardoso
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Basically, we originally had the variable that stores a set "set_+UID" set_glassTy but the problem is we don't want to use the UID for printing. When using "set_+Symbol" set_g the name is not very descriptive. The question is should we use shortname rather than symbol?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants