forked from net-art-uchicago/DHR-Corporate-Power
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
index.html
518 lines (459 loc) · 22.7 KB
/
index.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
<style>
body {
background-color: var(--color-one)
}
/* custom colors so we can maintain them throughout/ change easy */
:root{
--color-one: #C6CDC7;
--color-two: #753742;
--color-three: #003459;
--color-four: #00171F;
--color-five: #BC8DA0;
}
/* .logo {
width: 100%;
} */
/*
article {
max-width: 500px;
margin: 0 auto;
color: rgb(255, 255, 255);
} */
h1 {
font-family: serif;
padding-bottom: 10px;
border-bottom: 4px solid var(--color-three);
text-align: center;
font-size: 52px;
}
h2 {
font-family: serif;
text-align: left;
font-size: 32px;
font-weight: bold;
}
p {
line-height: 20px;
}
* { box-sizing: border-box; }
strong {
color: black;
}
.individual {
display: none;
}
.materialities {
display: none;
}
.institutions {
display: none;
}
.knowledge {
display: none;
}
.definition{
font-size: 32px;
margin-left: 2%;
}
.definition2{
font-size: 28px;
margin-left: 2%
}
.defText{
margin-right: 10%;
}
.grid2 {
width: 100%;
vertical-align: text-top;
background: var(--color-five);
border-radius: 15px;
border: 2px solid var(--color-four);
margin: 20 auto;
position: relative;
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 2fr;
}
.right {
font-size: 22px;
}
.grid {
width: 100%;
background: var(--color-two);
border-radius: 15px;
border: 2px solid var(--color-four);
margin: 0 auto;
position: relative;
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
/* grid-template-rows: 1fr,1fr */
}
.grid > div {
padding: 50px;
font-size: 32px;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
color: white;
}
.grid > div:hover {
color: var(--color-one);
cursor: pointer;
}
.pop-up {
position: relative;
background: rgb(151, 186, 180);
border-radius: 15px;
border: 2px solid var(--color-four);
color: var(--color-four);
width: 100%;
height: fit-content;
padding: 15px;
display: none;
}
.pop-up > .close {
position: absolute;
font-weight: bold;
color: var(--color-four);
top: 10px;
right: 15px;
}
.pop-up > .close:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}
</style>
<body>
<!-- Header and title information -->
<h1>
Corporate Power
</h1>
<!-- beginning of our background paragraph -->
<h2>
Maintaining accountability within the digital world.
</h2>
<h3>
Introduction
</h3>
<p>
In our current moment, we find the line between the “real” and digital world becoming increasingly blurry.
More and more, real, tangible societal outcomes are determined by digital parameters, with little consideration for potential repercussions.
The increasing interdependence between the “real” and digital world implies a need to fundamentally question how we conceptualize the structure of our communities and institutions.
Throughout history, when we have similarly found ourselves in the midst of this sort of paradigm shift, we return to human rights to anchor our commonly held beliefs.
It is for this reason that we must necessarily consider the implications of the digital world on our human rights, at the risk of exploiting the most vulnerable members of our community.
</p>
<p>
As digital parameters become increasingly important in determining real societal outcomes, it is paramount that we question who and what controls those digital parameters and how that control impacts our human rights.
In this document, we seek to manage this relationship, protecting the rights of users while also considering how responsible corporations can implement and support those rights.
But before we can determine how corporations fit within the digital rights space, we must first generally understand how both power and corporate power is generally produced.
</p>
<h3>
What Is Corporate Power?
</h3>
<p>
To systematically consider the role of corporate power in the digital sphere,
we employ David Birchall’s framework for characterizing corporate power over human rights (2011).
In his analytical framework, Birchall begins by defining power, using the language of Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall:
<div class="grid2">
<h3 class="definition">
<strong>Power is...</strong>
</h3>
<p class="defText">
<u>“The production, in and through social relations, of effects that shape the capacities of actors to determine their circumstances and fate”</u>
-Barnett and Duvall, <i>Power in International Politics</i>
</p>
</div>
</p>
<p>
From this, Birchall derives his definition of Corporate Power as follows:
<div class="grid2">
<h3 class="definition2">
<strong>Corporate Power is...</strong>
</h3>
<p class="defText">
<u>“The production, by business enterprises, in and through social relations, of effects that shape the capacities of individuals to enjoy their human rights.” </u>
-Barnett and Duvall, <i>Power in International Politics</i>
</p>
</div>
</p>
<p>
From this definition of corporate power, Birchall identifies 4 areas in which this corporate power is specifically produced:
<strong>the power over individuals, the power over materialities, the power over institutions, and the power over knowledge.
</strong>
</p>
<p>
While Birchall’s framework refers to the human rights that are already established in the “real world,” we use Birchall’s framework to consider how these categories and their implied transgressions on human rights shift and transform when transposed onto a digital context.
</p>
<!-- information for our expansion settings -->
<!-- each of these divs can old their own information and should
pull into the grid if needed. idk about non standard text tho -->
<div class="individual">
<h2>
Individual:
</h2>
<p>
Birchall defines the power over individuals as: “The power that a corporation has to shape directly the human rights possibilities of individuals”.
In essence, this refers to the ability of Corporations to control and affect individual rights, through means like targeting vulnerable individuals or exercising compulsory power over an individual or group.
We observe this in various forms in the real world, including labor violations, criminal or tortious wrongs, and privacy violations.
</p>
<p>
Considering corporate power over individuals in the digital sphere, however, poses the unique challenge of actually defining the individual.
Online, an individual person may take many forms through different profiles, accounts, digital fingerprints, and IP addresses. With this in mind, we envision the online individual as anyone who uses the internet, anyone who uses technology for employment, the account owner of a digital profile, and a digital consumer with the right to exercise free will.
While this definition may be incomplete, we hope it lays the groundwork for considering the online individual.
</p>
<p>
Some examples of how the corporate power over individuals may infringe on human rights include:
<ul>
<li>Control of personal information</li>
<li>Emotional and mental manipulation through advertisements</li>
<li>Algorithmic Biases</li>
<li>The use of paywalls to gatekeep public information.</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>
We believe that each of these examples violate specific human rights either found in the
<a href="https://www.un.org/en/udhrbook/pdf/udhr_booklet_en_web.pdf">UDHR (Universal Declaration of Human Rights)</a>
or proposed in the
<a href="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_452">EDDR (European Declaration of Digital Rights)</a>.
For example, the control of personal information without user consent, impedes on the
<u>Right to Privacy</u>.Or the lack of protection against
<a href="https://physicsworld.com/a/fighting-algorithmic-bias-in-artificial-intelligence/">algorithmic biases</a> infringes on an individual’s
<u>Right to Non-Discrimination</u>.
</p>
<p>
Thus we determined the following set of rights would best protect against the corporate power over the individual:
<ul>
<li>Right to security and respect of fundamental rights</li>
<li>Right to fair, just, healthy, and safe working conditions in the digital environment</li>
<li>Right to free will (through making informed choices in the digital environment)</li>
<li>Right to protection against risks and harm to one’s health, safety, and fundamental rights</li>
<li>Right to freedom of expression in the online environment</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>
While we believe these rights would best protect the individual, we believe that our ideas are best used to build a foundation for other groups.
Therefore if you would like to learn more about some of the other groups ideas follow these links:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://net-art-uchicago.github.io/DHR-Privacy">Privacy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://net-art-uchicago.github.io/DHR-Expression">Expression</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
</div>
<div class="institutions">
<h2>Institutions:</h2>
<p>
The corporate power over institutions can be defined as, “The mediated power that a corporation has to shape the human rights possibilities of individuals’ through control of or influence over a governance institution”.
In essence, this refers to the power that corporations have to control and influence the entities responsible for the formation of our society.
Some examples of this power include the ability of corporations to lobby for their own interests, and the ability of corporations to implement public services through the privatization of government contracts.
</p>
<p>
The power corporations have over institutions is further maintained online.
In order to conceptualize institutions in the digital sphere, we consider:
<ol>
<li>Online institutions (the systems that control the internet and the physical infrastructure which creates the digital world)</li>
<li> The governmental/societal institutions that rely on the internet and technology to function. A specific example of this can be found in the use of
<a href="https://www.brookings.edu/research/understanding-risk-assessment-instruments-in-criminal-justice/#:~:text=Algorithmic%20tools%20are%20in%20widespread,is%20most%20likely%20to%20occur.">algorithms within the justice system</a></li>
</ol>
</p>
<p>
Some examples of how the corporate power over individuals may infringe on human rights include:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/07/isps-spent-235-million-on-lobbying-and-donations-more-than-320000-a-day/">Lobbying to maintain favorable conditions</a></li>
<li>Framing Damages as merely the Cost of Operation</li>
<li><a href="https://www.jsonline.com/in-depth/news/2021/07/14/weve-spent-billions-provide-broadband-rural-areas-what-failed-wisconsin/7145014002/">Privatization of Government contracts</a></li>
<li>Use of algorithms in institutions (justice system, foster care)</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>
We believe that each of these examples violate specific human rights either found in the
<a href="https://www.un.org/en/udhrbook/pdf/udhr_booklet_en_web.pdf">UDHR (Universal Declaration of Human Rights)</a>
or proposed in the
<a href="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_452">EDDR (European Declaration of Digital Rights)</a>.
For example, privatization of government contracts may impede on the
<u>Right to Free-Will</u>,by not allowing users to choose their providers or services to the fullest extent.
Or the non-protection against algorithmic biases infringes on an individual’s
<u>Right to Non-Discrimination</u>, as seen in our section about the online Individual.
</p>
<p>
Thus we determined the following set of rights would best protect against the corporate power over Institutions
<ul>
<li>Right to equal protection of the law </li>
<li>Freedom of choice and right to free will</li>
<li>Right to privacy</li>
<li>Right to non-discrimination</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>
While we believe these rights would best protect from the corporate power over institutions, we believe that our ideas are best used to build a foundation for other groups.
Therefore if you would like to learn more about some of the other groups ideas follow these links:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://net-art-uchicago.github.io/DHR-Privacy">Privacy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://net-art-uchicago.github.io/DHR-Expression">Expression</a></li>
<li><a href="https://net-art-uchicago.github.io/DHR-Property">Property</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
</div>
<div class="materialities">
<h2>
Materialities:
</h2>
<p>
Corporate power over materialities can be defined as, “The mediated power that a corporation has to shape the human rights possibilities of individuals through control of material conditions or resources’ through control of or influence over a governance institution”.
In essence, this refers to the power that corporations have over the material goods and conditions on which human rights rely.
Some real life examples of this power would be corporate control over land and finance, or the corporate impact on the environment.
</p>
<p>
However, the power corporations have over materialities is further extended once we go online.
Thus it is important that we define exactly what materialities are under corporate control in the digital sphere.
We believe the most significant online materialities under corporate control are:
<ul>
<li>User data</li>
<li>Control over Bandwidth and user speeds</li>
<li>The Functionality of digital products, UI’s, etc.</li>
<li>The physical Infrastructure of the internet (As mentioned in the Institutions section)</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>
While most of these materials may present obvious pathways for abuse, some examples of how the corporate power over materialities may infringe on human rights include:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/22351108/dark-patterns-ui-web-design-privacy)">The use of Dark Patterns to coerce user behavior</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2020/2/18/21126347/antitrust-monopolies-internet-telecommunications-cheerleading">ISP antitrust issues</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/23/technology/big-tech-climate-change.html"></a>Tech companies contributions to climate change</li>
<li><a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/07/privacy-policies-give-companies-lots-of-room-to-collect-share-data.html">Buying/Selling user’s personal information without their explicit knowledge/consent</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>
We believe that each of these examples violate specific human rights either found in the
<a href="https://www.un.org/en/udhrbook/pdf/udhr_booklet_en_web.pdf">UDHR (Universal Declaration of Human Rights)</a>
or proposed in the
<a href="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_452">EDDR (European Declaration of Digital Rights)</a>.
For example, the use of dark patterns may threaten the
<u>Right to a Fair Online Environment</u>,by misleading users for corporate gain. Alternatively, Big Tech’s impact on climate change directly threatens a person's
<u>Right to a Sustainable Environment</u>, as described in the UDHR.
</p>
<p>
Thus we determined the following set of rights would best protect against the corporate power over Materialities:
<ul>
<li>Right to a fair online environment</li>
<li>Right to freedom of choice</li>
<li>Right to one’s property</li>
<li>Right to a sustainable environment</li>
<li>Right to access/education</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>
While we believe these rights would best protect from the corporate power over materialities, we believe that our ideas are best used to build a foundation for other groups.
Therefore if you would like to learn more about some of the other groups ideas follow these links:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://net-art-uchicago.github.io/DHR-Expression">Expression</a></li>
<li><a href="https://net-art-uchicago.github.io/DHR-Property">Property</a></li>
<li><a href="https://net-art-uchicago.github.io/DHR-Ecology">Ecology</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
</div>
<div class="knowledge">
<h2>
Knowledge:
</h2>
<p>
Corporate power over knowledge is defined by Birchall as: “The power that a corporation has to shape knowledge of human rights and the wider epistemic framework in which human rights exist”.
In essence, this refers to the corporate control over how human rights are viewed and spoken about in broader discourse.
This includes the setting of social norms, the corporate implementation of human rights, and general discourse regarding human rights.
</p>
<p>
However, the Corporate control over knowledge is even further exacerbated once we go online. We have expanded Birchall’s conception of the corporate power over knowledge to not just include discourse about human rights, but also the general production and dissemination of knowledge. Thus, we have defined knowledge in the digital world as:
<ul>
<li>Online Rights/ Issues Discourse</li>
<li>Online Social Norms</li>
<li>Transparency between Users and Companies</li>
<li>Knowledge about if things are real/true</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>
Some examples of how the corporate power over knowledge can infringe on human rights include:
<ul>
<li>Lack of transparency over corporate practices</li>
<li><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/03/facebook-misinformation-nyu-study/">Poor management of misinformation on social media</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56581266">Use of bots to maintain pro corporation values</a></li>
<li>Gatekeeping public information</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>
We believe that each of these examples violate specific human rights either found in the
<a href="https://www.un.org/en/udhrbook/pdf/udhr_booklet_en_web.pdf">UDHR (Universal Declaration of Human Rights)</a>
or proposed in the
<a href="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_452">EDDR (European Declaration of Digital Rights)</a>.
For example, the use of bots to maintain pro-corporate values within online discourse violates the
<u>Right to a Trustworthy Online Environment</u>,
by directly manipulating and misinforming public discourse. There are other countless examples of Big Tech further impeding on the aforementioned
<u>Right to a Trustworthy online environment</u>
by continuing the flood of misinformation within online discourse.
</p>
<p>
Thus we determined the following set of rights would best protect against the corporate power over Knowledge:
<ul>
<li>Right to corporate transparency (for the sake of understanding if your rights are being violated in the first place)</li>
<li>Right to a trustworthy online environment </li>
<li>Right to education / right to access</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>
While we believe these rights would best protect from the corporate power over knowledge, we believe that our ideas are best used to build a foundation for other groups.
Therefore if you would like to learn more about some of the other groups ideas follow these links:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://net-art-uchicago.github.io/DHR-Expression">Expression</a></li>
<li><a href="https://net-art-uchicago.github.io/DHR-Property">Property</a></li>
<li><a href="https://net-art-uchicago.github.io/DHR-Education">Education</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
</div>
<h3>
Corporate Power over Digital Human Rights
</h3>
<!-- Start of our grid -->
<div class="grid">
<div data-info="individual" >Individual</div>
<div data-info="materialities">Materialities</div>
<div data-info="institutions">Institutions</div>
<div data-info="knowledge">Knowledge</div>
</div>
<section class="pop-up">
<div class="close">×</div>
<p class="info"> <!-- info goes here --></p>
</section>
<h3>
Declaration of Digital Rights Under Corporate Power
</h3>
<p>
While we have outlined various specific rights within the UDHR and EDDR that we believe are relevant to the discussion of Digital Rights and Corporate Power, we further propose the following right to prevent loopholes and overstepping from corporations as we move forward. Thus we propose:
</p>
<p>
<i class="right">"No person on the internet shall have their digital rights infringed upon by corporate actions, inactions, or through their control over institutions, materials and knowledge."
</i>
</p>
<p>
For the reasons established above, Corporations have the profound ability to influence human rights, both positively, in the realization and implementation of those rights, and negatively, in the violation and restriction of those rights. We believe that the protections and rights afforded to individuals offline should be extended to the digital world, particularly in the context of privacy, property, ecology, education, and expression. To ensure the enjoyment of these rights, we believe that users are entitled to protection from corporate infringement on their rights, and the allocation of corporate resources to implement and support those rights.
</p>
</body>
<script>
const popUp = document.querySelector('.pop-up')
const closeButton = document.querySelector('.close')
const infoElement = document.querySelector('.info')
const gridItems = document.querySelectorAll('.grid > div')
const grid = document.querySelector('.grid')
// const indiv = $( "div:contains('Individual')" ).attr("class");
gridItems.forEach(item => {
item.addEventListener('click', () => {
let t = document.getElementsByClassName(item.dataset.info)
for (let i = 0; i < t.length; i++)
{
let texts = t[i].innerHTML;
infoElement.innerHTML = texts;
}
grid.style.display = 'none'
popUp.style.display = 'flex'
})
})
closeButton.addEventListener('click', () => {
popUp.style.display = 'none'
grid.style.display = 'grid'
})
</script>