Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Would it make sense to implement linear algebra for complex matrices? #223

Open
jishnub opened this issue Apr 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@jishnub
Copy link
Member

jishnub commented Apr 22, 2022

Currently, one needs to split matrix multiplication into products over the components to avoid hitting generic fallback functions. Would it make sense to implement various matrix-multiplication methods for StructArray{<:Complex} types in this package as a convenience?

I realize that this risks becoming a minefield of ambiguities, so it'll require significant effort to disambiguate with all the structured matrix types defined in Base. It'll also mean that we'll have to add LinearAlgebra as a direct dependency.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant