You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now the resolution of the result seems to be limited to 1ns. This should be enough for expensive benchmarks but could be improved with averaging and may not be enough for benchmarking cheap operations that only takes a few ns.
I encounter these situations mainly when benchmarking low level operations. E.g. in JuliaLang/julia#16174, where the optimized version of g2 takes only 1.2ns per loop. It would be nice if I don't have to write my own loops for these.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now the resolution of the result seems to be limited to
1ns
. This should be enough for expensive benchmarks but could be improved with averaging and may not be enough for benchmarking cheap operations that only takes a fewns
.I encounter these situations mainly when benchmarking low level operations. E.g. in JuliaLang/julia#16174, where the optimized version of
g2
takes only1.2ns
per loop. It would be nice if I don't have to write my own loops for these.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: