-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
free usage should be in the first example #75
Comments
freeboson
changed the title
free usage should be in the first example
Oct 12, 2017
free
usage should be in the first example
Just out of curiosity, why you don't choose EzXML.jl? It frees allocated memories automatically and I believe it covers all functionalities of LightXML.jl. I would like to know the reason to improve my package. |
@bicycle1885 actually, my colleague ended up using |
Okay, thank you. |
See #45 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I was recently helping a colleague with his script that did some processing of XML files with this package. I was looking in all of the other places for why the memory usage was blowing up, before realizing it was due to not calling
free
.I completely understand now why the memory allocated by this package cannot be garbage collected, but this is definitely an important thing to stress. It first shows up in the readme about 2/3 of the way down, but IMO it's a basic requirement for using this package. I think the very first example should make use of
free
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: