-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename Range to AbstractRange? #21901
Comments
Any opposition to this change? If not, I'll make a PR. |
It was once called this and we changed it. You may want to look for the discussion around that change before going ahead with this. |
I think you may be thinking of the |
Right, I was misremembering. At least we're not going in circles :) |
Only in zigzags... I'll make a PR then. |
Range
is one of the very few Base abstract types which do not contain "Abstract" in their names. The only other case that comes to my mind is number types (Integer
,Real
...), which have been granted an exception. Should we rename it toAbstractRange
? This would be clearer IMHO, sinceRange
can intuitively be understood as the default range type (equivalent toArray
vs.AbstractArray
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: