You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems that many of our tuple-type manipulation functions in Base (eltype, tuple_type_cons, tuple_type_tail, tuple_type_head) assume that Tuples can't be put into Unions. This is rather silly.
Many of these also seem to be unnecessarily marked as @pure, when it may be possible to write them more succinctly in a way that inference can optimize much more effectively than just simply being pure:
It seems that many of our tuple-type manipulation functions in Base (eltype, tuple_type_cons, tuple_type_tail, tuple_type_head) assume that Tuples can't be put into Unions. This is rather silly.
Many of these also seem to be unnecessarily marked as
@pure
, when it may be possible to write them more succinctly in a way that inference can optimize much more effectively than just simply being pure:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: