-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
div(pi,pi), rem(pi,pi) etc undefined #26701
Comments
Since operations with irrationals default to Float64 results, those should probably all return 0.0 and 1.0. |
May not be the same thing but https://discourse.julialang.org/t/comparison-of-same-irrationals-by-throws-error/1342 . May be even more for the same irrationals. |
re returning 0.0 and 1.0 (yes, the |
For the infinities, see #26694. |
all of these paths lead to good places |
It looks natural to extend the list at
|
Maybe this could be added to the PR, (in its correct form)
similar to how
|
We discussed this on triage, and felt that it is better to be explicit about the transforms for irrational numbers into the appropriate computational types and not add more methods to them. |
This issue was raised in this discourse thread
possible remedy
and these, as currently evaluated, are anomalous (suggestions follow)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: