Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

generic_matvecmul fails for some non-scalar element type and adjoint combinations #45029

Closed
JasonPries opened this issue Apr 19, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@JasonPries
Copy link
Contributor

Here is a super stripped down MWE.

In the example below, I would expect M'*x to return a Vector{Float64} equivalent to [2.0]. But it looks like the fact that the matrix elements themselves should be adjoint is lost somewhere along the way to generic_matvecmul, which attempts straight multiplication of two vectors, rather than taking their inner product.

julia> M = [[[1.0]];;]
1×1 Matrix{Vector{Float64}}:
 [1.0]

julia> x = [[[2.0]];]
1-element Vector{Vector{Float64}}:
 [2.0]

julia> M'*x
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching *(::Vector{Float64}, ::Vector{Float64})
Closest candidates are:
  *(::Any, ::Any, ::Any, ::Any...) at /Applications/Julia-1.7.app/Contents/Resources/julia/share/julia/base/operators.jl:655
  *(::StridedMatrix{T}, ::StridedVector{S}) where {T<:Union{Float32, Float64, ComplexF32, ComplexF64}, S<:Real} at /Applications/Julia-1.7.app/Contents/Resources/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/LinearAlgebra/src/matmul.jl:44
  *(::StridedVecOrMat, ::Adjoint{<:Any, <:LinearAlgebra.LQPackedQ}) at /Applications/Julia-1.7.app/Contents/Resources/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/LinearAlgebra/src/lq.jl:266
  ...
Stacktrace:
 [1] generic_matvecmul!(C::Vector{Union{}}, tA::Char, A::Matrix{Vector{Float64}}, B::Vector{Vector{Float64}}, _add::LinearAlgebra.MulAddMul{true, true, Bool, Bool})
   @ LinearAlgebra /Applications/Julia-1.7.app/Contents/Resources/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/LinearAlgebra/src/matmul.jl:745
 [2] mul!
   @ /Applications/Julia-1.7.app/Contents/Resources/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/LinearAlgebra/src/matmul.jl:129 [inlined]
 [3] mul!
   @ /Applications/Julia-1.7.app/Contents/Resources/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/LinearAlgebra/src/matmul.jl:275 [inlined]
 [4] *(adjA::Adjoint{Adjoint{Float64, Vector{Float64}}, Matrix{Vector{Float64}}}, x::Vector{Vector{Float64}})
   @ LinearAlgebra /Applications/Julia-1.7.app/Contents/Resources/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/LinearAlgebra/src/matmul.jl:113
 [5] top-level scope
   @ REPL[152]:1

In contrast, these three other similar operations, seem to work correctly:

julia> M'*M
1×1 Matrix{Float64}:
 1.0

julia> x'*x
4.0

julia> N = [[[1.0]'];;]
1×1 Matrix{Adjoint{Float64, Vector{Float64}}}:
 [1.0;;]

julia> N*x
1-element Vector{Float64}:
 2.0
julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 1.7.2
Commit bf53498635 (2022-02-06 15:21 UTC)
Platform Info:
  OS: macOS (x86_64-apple-darwin19.5.0)
  CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz
  WORD_SIZE: 64
  LIBM: libopenlibm
  LLVM: libLLVM-12.0.1 (ORCJIT, skylake)
@KristofferC
Copy link
Member

JuliaLang/LinearAlgebra.jl#500 is the same issue I think. I made a halfhearted try to fix it in #42715 but it seems that PR is incomplete.

@jishnub
Copy link
Contributor

jishnub commented Nov 26, 2024

This is fixed now on Julia v1.11.1. I think #54151 was the fix.

@jishnub jishnub closed this as completed Nov 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants