-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inconsistent behaviour of hasproperty
with Modules
#47150
Comments
Related: #46857 |
For modules, I think it makes more sense to use |
I feel liked |
That's basically what #44231 did and why we now have |
Makes sense. We really need to sort out deprecating warnings that warn only for deprecations that are directly your fault. IMO we can close this as resolved |
I don't think this is resolved since |
it is valid to add Or should |
Seems valid, though I think it may be isresolved and ispublic? |
Julia 1.8.2, Linux
I feel like the behavior of
{has,get}{property,field}
is a bit suspect when it comes to Modules. The following example should be sufficiently illustrative.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: