You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The latest documentation doesn't match reality at all. I think this should be fixed before the 0.3 release, but I'm not sure on how to fix it myself.
This needs to be rephrased or split:
and any version of the operator may be used if one of the inputs is a scalar.
since #853 makes it false for 3. Comparison.
It's also not really true for ^, since A^2 is different from A.^2 and 2.^A works but 2^A doesn't. (I agree with what Julia does here.)
The following built-in functions are also vectorized, whereby the functions act element-wise:
max and min should probably be taken out of that list and a separate paragraph quickly explaining maximum and minimum added.
Is it intended that both minimum(A, A+2) and min(A, A+2) work? The former doesn't seem it should work reading the doc and #4235.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also minimum(A, A+2) will probably not do what you want, because the second parameter to minimum is called region and is used if you want the minimum value per region.
The latest documentation doesn't match reality at all. I think this should be fixed before the 0.3 release, but I'm not sure on how to fix it myself.
This needs to be rephrased or split:
since #853 makes it false for
3. Comparison
.It's also not really true for
^
, sinceA^2
is different fromA.^2
and2.^A
works but2^A
doesn't. (I agree with what Julia does here.)max
andmin
should probably be taken out of that list and a separate paragraph quickly explainingmaximum
andminimum
added.Is it intended that both
minimum(A, A+2)
andmin(A, A+2)
work? The former doesn't seem it should work reading the doc and #4235.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: