You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Today I downloaded the v0.3-prerelease latest Windows binary and checked out the new .julia_history format as described on the mailing list
I noticed the time not showing up in the file:
# time:
# mode: julia
1 + 1
The time functionality is implemented using strftime("%F %T %Z", time()), however this returns an empty string on my system. However the equivalent strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z", time()) does return the correct result. This change would be the easy fix, however I do not understand why the original doesn't work in the first place.
julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 0.3.0-prerelease+3556
Commit 308139b* (2014-06-08 10:20 UTC)
Platform Info:
System: Windows (x86_64-w64-mingw32)
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3360M CPU @ 2.80GHz
WORD_SIZE: 64
BLAS: libopenblas (USE64BITINT DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY)
LAPACK: libopenblas
LIBM: libopenlibm
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Today I downloaded the v0.3-prerelease latest Windows binary and checked out the new
.julia_history
format as described on the mailing listI noticed the time not showing up in the file:
The time functionality is implemented using
strftime("%F %T %Z", time())
, however this returns an empty string on my system. However the equivalentstrftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z", time())
does return the correct result. This change would be the easy fix, however I do not understand why the original doesn't work in the first place.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: