Fix some method signatures related AbstractQ's #211
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #211 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.68% 99.68%
=======================================
Files 22 22
Lines 1591 1591
=======================================
Hits 1586 1586
Misses 5 5
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This was referenced Sep 7, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
AbstractQused to subtypeAbstractMatrix, but since Julia v1.10 no longer does. This fixes a few method signatures in places where we do want to includeAbstractQs (usually where they get wrapped byWrappedMap). This does not include things likemul!(Y, A::LinearMap, Q::AbstractQ).Depends on JuliaLang/julia#51132.
Closes #214.