Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GeometryBasics vs GeometryTypes #39

Closed
weymouth opened this issue Jul 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

GeometryBasics vs GeometryTypes #39

weymouth opened this issue Jul 29, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@weymouth
Copy link

GeometryTypes has been discontinued in favour of GeometryBasics. I'm interested in used the distance functions in this module, but is there any push to update this to work with GeometryBasics:AbstractMesh?

@sjkelly
Copy link

sjkelly commented Aug 3, 2021

I commented in the issue on GeometryBasics, but a good approach here would be to add both GeometryTypes and GeometryBasics as dependencies, and have them both imported in the codebase. This should allow for a gradual migration without breaking dependent packages. Of course you get more dependencies, but it seems like a reasonable trade-off for greater compatibility/flexibility.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants