We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The failure never happened on my local test.
I compared the logpdf and logpdf! for Dirichlet distribution and did not find any errors in the implementation.
logpdf
logpdf!
Any thoughts about what the possible cause to the Travis failure is?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'll look into it tonight.
-- John
On Jul 27, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Dahua Lin notifications@github.com wrote:
The failure never happened on my local test. I compared the logpdf and logpdf! for Dirichlet distribution and did not find any errors in the implementation. Any thoughts about what the possible cause to the Travis failure is? — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Sorry, something went wrong.
The problem is that gemv and At_mul_B in travis produced wrong results.
gemv
At_mul_B
I open an issue in Base: JuliaLang/julia#3851
Looks like the problem has been resolved by upstream fixes.
No branches or pull requests
The failure never happened on my local test.
I compared the
logpdf
andlogpdf!
for Dirichlet distribution and did not find any errors in the implementation.Any thoughts about what the possible cause to the Travis failure is?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: