You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Generally I find the GetDist Python package based on this paper does a much better job producing accurate contours than this one, in particular for close-to-Gaussian distributions and especialy with boundaries. E.g. here's a comparison for 100 samples from a unit normal distribution (top row) or a unit normal truncated below 0 (bottom row; code at the end of this post):
I don't know if there's any motivation here from anyone to borrow / implement some ideas from that paper, but I figured I'd put it out there, it would be very nice to have a pure-Julia version.
Generally I find the GetDist Python package based on this paper does a much better job producing accurate contours than this one, in particular for close-to-Gaussian distributions and especialy with boundaries. E.g. here's a comparison for 100 samples from a unit normal distribution (top row) or a unit normal truncated below 0 (bottom row; code at the end of this post):
I don't know if there's any motivation here from anyone to borrow / implement some ideas from that paper, but I figured I'd put it out there, it would be very nice to have a pure-Julia version.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: