- Lodewijk Muns. Why I am not a Schenkerian
- David Temperley. Composition, Perception, and Schenkerian Theory
- David Temperley. The Question of Purpose in Music Theory: Description, Suggestion and Explanation
- List several books that are build on Schenkerian principles. (Eg. from the Oxford Studies in Music Theory) - Eg. Schmalfeldt "In The Process of Becoming", Aldwell–Schachter, Kostka–Payne (the Tonal one)
- Emphasize that it's a US thing
- Diergarten/Neuwirth, when publishing a modern study book on form (2019), explicitly say that, while they base their book on Marx/Ratz/Schoenberg, Darcy/Hepokoski and Caplin, "Strategies geared towards Heinrich Schenker are not central to the book (regardless of this, superordinate frameworks are occasionally included for illustration purposes)"
- https://sites.google.com/site/euromac2014/programme/4a/mathews
- David Huron. On the future of music research - see a notion of Poetic Scholarship
- https://academic.udayton.edu/PhillipMagnuson/soundpatterns/ is Schenkerian
- Narmour "Beyond Schenkerism" - the author promotes his "implication-realization model" instead, which isn't popular
- Leslie David Blasius. Schenker's Argument and the Claims of Music Theory - Probably not a critique, but at least some fresh examination
- A Generative Theory of Tonal Music - An attempt to build a generative grammar for common-practice (pre-20-century) music. This work is also continued in the essay, the second book where the switch from generative grammar to preference rules occurs, and the path is reflected in the third one.
- Jason Yust. Organized Time: Rhythm, Tonality, and Form - not necessarily Schenkerian, but illustrations have that flavour of reductionism
