New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should the Operation in P2POperation include a Synchronization field? #25

Open

erdunn opened this issue Feb 7, 2015 · 0 comments

erdunn commented Feb 7, 2015

One of the attributes of PUT operations is the ability to specific a Synchronization type, i.e. one of WRITETHROUGH, WRITEBACK, or FLUSH.

Should the Operation sub-message of a P2POperation also include that ability?

If not, what is the expected (default) behavior for a PUT operation generated from a P2POperation? Is it it WRITETHROUGH, WRITEBACK, or FLUSH?

-Eric

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment