Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong transferable balance #2849

Closed
Juanma0x opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Wrong transferable balance #2849

Juanma0x opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
feedback Feedback from users or partners important Import task need to be focused
Milestone

Comments

@Juanma0x
Copy link

Juanma0x commented Apr 1, 2024

The way transferable balance might not be updated to the current balance pallet.
Example:
Account 15aVbh9j99DyEJo9pYDs6UMB25ybHAteb4xmjnXkiBx855Qo shows a transferable balance of 0 in SubWallet:
image

While a free balance of 8.47 DOT (at the time of writing) querying the chain state (system.account):
image

Related:
polkadot-js/apps#9988
paritytech/polkadot-sdk#1833 (comment)

@Sokol142196 Sokol142196 added feedback Feedback from users or partners important Import task need to be focused labels Apr 2, 2024
@Sokol142196 Sokol142196 added this to the Milestone 7 milestone Apr 2, 2024
@nampc1
Copy link

nampc1 commented Apr 2, 2024

Hi @Juanma0x, we're aware of this issue and actually have an open issue on this. We'll make an update asap, thanks for raising the issue

@nampc1 nampc1 assigned S2kael and unassigned nampc1 Apr 2, 2024
@Juanma0x
Copy link
Author

Juanma0x commented Apr 2, 2024

Thanks, @nampc1, for letting me know. I wasn't aware of #2118. Feel free to close this issue since it's duplicated. I apologize for not detecting the previous issue.

@nampc1 nampc1 closed this as completed May 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feedback Feedback from users or partners important Import task need to be focused
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants