You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Have you put any thought into supporting a machine readable output format (like aws cli --output json, etc) for the purposes of automation? I know this tool was created for humans to directly manage stacks, but I've got a few projects where we've got large cfn-cli config files, and we're exploring whether we could switch to a CI/CD approach through CodePipeline, Build, etc. To do any sort of automated deployments, we would need to be able to parse the outputs.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not yet, I'm mostly just checking in first before I put any time into it. My thinking is that if we want tooling to run cfn-cli, we would want said tooling to be able to parse the result of any given command. I'm thinking that we could probably suppress the real-time CFN Event logging in this case, as there is no human watching the output. Instead, we would just output a standard "result" JSON object for any commands which could then be parsed for success/failure.
Hey folks,
Have you put any thought into supporting a machine readable output format (like aws cli --output json, etc) for the purposes of automation? I know this tool was created for humans to directly manage stacks, but I've got a few projects where we've got large cfn-cli config files, and we're exploring whether we could switch to a CI/CD approach through CodePipeline, Build, etc. To do any sort of automated deployments, we would need to be able to parse the outputs.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: