Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[GeoMechanicsApplication] Creation of a backbone model for interface elements #12447

Open
rfaasse opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@rfaasse
Copy link
Contributor

rfaasse commented Jun 12, 2024

For linear truss elements a backbone with un and reloading model is ( being ) created. That shows the mechanism for switching between a backbone and an elastic un and reloading branch.

For interface elements the following is important:

  • Interfaces have more ( number of dimensions ) traction and relative displacement components ( as opposed to only 1 axial component for a truss ). The backbone model could work for the normal component of the interface and for a resultant shear component. ( in 2D there is only 1 shear component, which then is the effective one. In 3D 2 shear components together form an effective shear, this makes unloading reloading detection more involved )
  • the truss model so far has a backbone that mirrors in positive and negative domain. For tension cutoff on the interface normal behaviour a continuous backbone defined from the negative to the positive domain may be useful.
  • material input syntax that distinguishes normal and shear has to be thought trough.
  • When "ready" the interface backbone model has to be deployed in the wall interfaces of the tunnel model.

Update 21 Aug 2024

After a brief discussion, we decided we shouldn't spend our effort on this type of material model, but rather focus on Coulomb-like models.

@rfaasse
Copy link
Contributor Author

rfaasse commented Jul 1, 2024

@WPK4FEM @mcgicjn2 Moving this back to the backlog, since for the user meeting we're realistically only able to use linear elastic materials for the interfaces for now. After the investigations in the current sprint (18), it might be possible to pick it up again

@mcgicjn2
Copy link
Contributor

mcgicjn2 commented Aug 8, 2024

Will be picked up by @WPK4FEM and modified to a more appropriate model.

@avdg81
Copy link
Contributor

avdg81 commented Oct 30, 2024

We will create a new issue for the Coulomb-like model based on the latest insights.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants