Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#578: Add optional flag for Changes API to limit update operation out… #29

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2017

Conversation

Viatorus
Copy link
Member

…put to modified properties only. Also includes properties flagged as unique, since they would be needed to identify the item that is updated.

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

[ ] Bugfix
[ ] Feature
[ ] Code style update (formatting, local variables)
[ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
[ ] Build related changes
[ ] CI related changes
[ ] Documentation content changes
[ ] Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

Other information

…put to modified properties only. Also includes properties flagged as unique, since they would be needed to identify the item that is updated.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.08%) to 92.619% when pulling 641513b on change_api into 2ab7a1e on master.

@Viatorus Viatorus merged commit 8c8088e into master Sep 27, 2017
@Viatorus Viatorus deleted the change_api branch September 27, 2017 20:01
Viatorus added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2017
…on output to modified properties only (#29)

Also includes properties flagged as unique, since they would be needed to identify the item that is updated. (from techfort/LokiJS#578)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants