-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Benchmark FFTW planning #158
Comments
So I did some benchmarks for First, all the data (starting at 1024 samples). For each plot, lower is faster. Colours present different numbers of modes and dashes different planning modes. The number of threads here is set with I think the first conclusion here is that Second, a comparison of single- and multi-threaded performance: Thoughts? |
Yes, |
Ah I misremembered and thought that was the case for |
This is useful quite often, dropping say a 12 h sim to 6 h. But in those cases I expect most of the effort is actually in the nonlinear operator. |
What about free space? |
Next on the list, but needs to run overnight. |
Note that FFTW now does not set threads by default: JuliaMath/FFTW.jl#151 |
Do we need
FFTW.PATIENT
or isMEASURE
or evenESTIMATE
good enough?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: