You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 6, 2019. It is now read-only.
I was having trouble downloading my license and enabling pro for some reason. And Xprivacy's name in the top left never changes. So I'd try to fetch a restriction, but it'd keep sending me to the website (I didn't notice that "Pro Version" was in the Menu when you didn't have Pro). Can you change the name in the top left to XPrivacy Pro (or similar) so the user can tell at a glance if he has the Pro version or not? Maybe XPrivacy+ with Play Store app, and XPrivacy+ Pro with both? I'm just snowballing ideas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The "about" dialog shows where to put the license file and if everything is okay at the same place your name is shown. If you still have troubles with activation the Pro features, please contact me by replying to the activation instructions and I will try to help you.
My email app was having problems downloading it and putting it into the proper location even though it said it did. I eventually just had to download and Save as to get it to work. Not a problem with XPrivacy, just my email app's problem.
I just thought that having a more visible indication would be nice, and feel the user with a heightened sense of awesomeness since it says Pro.
I was having trouble downloading my license and enabling pro for some reason. And Xprivacy's name in the top left never changes. So I'd try to fetch a restriction, but it'd keep sending me to the website (I didn't notice that "Pro Version" was in the Menu when you didn't have Pro). Can you change the name in the top left to XPrivacy Pro (or similar) so the user can tell at a glance if he has the Pro version or not? Maybe XPrivacy+ with Play Store app, and XPrivacy+ Pro with both? I'm just snowballing ideas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: