Validation of the MROS metamodel.

[darkobozhinoski]

o Manual test: write small example model instances that we can express each element that is required
o Criteria to evaluate our test instances (they overlap):
· Requirements coverage
· Metamodel coverage

[chcorbato]

Meta-issue comments:

1. Is issue a subtask of this one? If that is the case, how I am keeping track of it is using task lists and links to sub-issues on the subtask that require their own separate issue:

• Manual test: write small example model instances that we can express each element that is required link to issue
• Criteria to evaluate our test instances (they overlap):
  • Requirements coverage
  • Metamodel coverage

2. I think this issue should also be in the metamodel repository:

• This repo contains the eclipse plugin
• https://github.com/MROS-RobMoSys-ITP/metacontrol_metamodels contains the Ecore metamodel
  But if you think it is better to keep the Ecore metamodel in the same repo as the tooling, that is ok. We can then just keep the conceptual metamodel in https://github.com/MROS-RobMoSys-ITP/metacontrol_metamodels