Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New script: dwicat #1428

Closed
Lestropie opened this issue Aug 15, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

New script: dwicat #1428

Lestropie opened this issue Aug 15, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Lestropie
Copy link
Member

(name suggestions welcome)

As raised in multiple locations:

A convenience script for concatenating multiple DWI series where the intensity scaling of image reconstruction may have varied due to recalibration. This would involve:

  • Extracting the b=0 volumes from each series.
    (Easiest would be to require .mifs at input so that gradient tables are embedded)

  • Using mrhistmatch scale or mrstats -output median to determine the global intensity fluctuations between acquisitions.

  • Concatenate all data into a single 4D image, applying appropriate multiplicative factors.

It should also check for variations in TE and TR between the input series, and warn where appropriate.

@Lestropie
Copy link
Member Author

Bump

@jdtournier
Copy link
Member

Sounds good, agree on the principle, and will definitely come in handy. I'd prefer the simpler name of dwicat personally. We could also make the intensity normalisation conditional on detecting a sufficiently large difference in scaling, along with a clear report about this? Also, I'd advocate using the raw DICOMs as input - though mifs would be fine too, of course.

@thijsdhollander
Copy link
Contributor

Yep, 100% agreed with all of @jdtournier's comments.

@Lestropie
Copy link
Member Author

Also, I'd advocate using the raw DICOMs as input - though mifs would be fine too, of course.

Any risk of interaction with dwidenoise?

@Lestropie
Copy link
Member Author

Closed by #1626.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants