You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tested these two methods and found that they may still be a bit inaccurate. For example: some 4/4 music in, some of his output value is 2, and the other is 3 .. Do you have any plans to revise these two methods in the near future?
In addition, I do not quite understand what the output of the meter value mean , such as a 3/4 music in his output value of 24.can you tell me how do you define meter value
Finally, Can you tell me your reference in the design of these two methods?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
These algorithms are purely experimental, that is, they were never finalized and evaluated. There are no references to support the implementation. You can check the implementation code here.
Beatogram takes an input sequence of energy band ratios in beats sequence and filters it to keep only salient bands.
Meter takes the resulting beat-sequence of filtered band energies. The implementation for this algorithm has not been finished. For now, it applies autocorrelation on each particular band and sums autocorrelation functions across bands to find out the predominant periodicity in terms of the number of consecutive beats.
I tested these two methods and found that they may still be a bit inaccurate. For example: some 4/4 music in, some of his output value is 2, and the other is 3 .. Do you have any plans to revise these two methods in the near future?
In addition, I do not quite understand what the output of the meter value mean , such as a 3/4 music in his output value of 24.can you tell me how do you define meter value
Finally, Can you tell me your reference in the design of these two methods?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: