You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For creating models to compare with observations, it would be nice to have some indication of where the majority of emitted radiation (per pixel) comes from. Practically, I need to output source functions and optical depth increments on rays. Note: this is already somewhat impractically implemented in model::compute_image_for_point.
The main implementation challenge would then be to create a new image type for this 4D data (pixel (x,y), position on ray (z)), frequency) and coherently add it to the rest of the codebase (TODO: contemplate whether it is better to create a new class or subclass the existing Image class).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For creating models to compare with observations, it would be nice to have some indication of where the majority of emitted radiation (per pixel) comes from. Practically, I need to output source functions and optical depth increments on rays. Note: this is already somewhat impractically implemented in
model::compute_image_for_point
.The main implementation challenge would then be to create a new image type for this 4D data (pixel (x,y), position on ray (z)), frequency) and coherently add it to the rest of the codebase (TODO: contemplate whether it is better to create a new class or subclass the existing
Image
class).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: