You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should add an option for adding continuum opacities/emissivities (frequency independent constant terms).
This requires some refactoring for solver::get_source_dtau and maybe even adding some datastructures to store these new things.
However, as I not the main user myself, I do not exactly know what to implement:
Do they have some location/density/temperature/... dependence?
Are these terms tabulated somewhere (eg in a paper, or preferably some database findable using astropy)?
If you are interested in seeing continuum contributions to emissivity/opacity being implemented in Magritte, please comment in this thread.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this would make Magritte more impactful in producing synthetic images. Maybe frequency-dependent terms are better. For H- free-free opacity which dominates the cool star continuum in ALMA range, a standard formula to use is given here https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988A%26A...193..189J/abstract
which depends on density, temperature, and frequency.
We should add an option for adding continuum opacities/emissivities (frequency independent constant terms).
This requires some refactoring for solver::get_source_dtau and maybe even adding some datastructures to store these new things.
However, as I not the main user myself, I do not exactly know what to implement:
If you are interested in seeing continuum contributions to emissivity/opacity being implemented in Magritte, please comment in this thread.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: