Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bad method name in 'methods available for automation' for Kasparov & Jansa #1562

Closed
eleanorcuallado opened this issue Apr 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@eleanorcuallado
Copy link

We recenly switched from Ivanchuk to Kasparov and I noticed during the testing of our code that the documentation does not take into account the following change in ManageIQ:

ManageIQ/manageiq#19211

which changed the name of the display attribute to visible. While the display method is still available, display= no longer exists (at least in Kasparov). The name should be changed to visible=.

(We are still going through our testing, I will update the issue if I find other similar errors).

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Feb 27, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

Thank you for all your contributions! More information about the ManageIQ triage process can be found in the triage process documentation.

@miq-bot miq-bot added the stale label Feb 27, 2023
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented May 29, 2023

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

Feel free to reopen this issue if this issue is still valid.

Thank you for all your contributions! More information about the ManageIQ triage process can be found in the triage process documentation.

@miq-bot miq-bot closed this as completed May 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants