Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[1.1.9] Problem with Lost steps with TMC2208 and power loss feature #11479

Closed
campy opened this issue Aug 7, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

[1.1.9] Problem with Lost steps with TMC2208 and power loss feature #11479

campy opened this issue Aug 7, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@campy
Copy link

campy commented Aug 7, 2018

Hi, i configure new marlin 1.1.9, i use TMC2208 Standalone driver in MKS GenL to 24V

When i use 1.1.8 i can print to 15 mm/s Jerk and 3500mm/s acceleration without problems or missing steps, but in new marlin when i put this jerk and aceleration i have a lot of missing steps.

I configure driver to TMC2208 Standalone and try to TMC2208 whit library but same problem, always i get missing steps

When i down jerk to 12mm/s and acceleration to 2000mm/s everything works ok but some times lost steps

Another curious thing is happen , when i define power loss features, my printer enter in a infinite bucle and reset when try to do G29 but i disable: #define S_CURVE_ACCELERATION and #define ADAPTIVE_STEP_SMOOTHING and now powerloss works perfectly

Anything have same problem with TMC2208?

Thanks and i apologize for my english

@campy
Copy link
Author

campy commented Aug 7, 2018

I try to modify this values for driver tmc2208 but same problem

#define MAXIMUM_STEPPER_RATE 400000
#define MINIMUM_STEPPER_PULSE 0
#define MINIMUM_STEPPER_DIR_DELAY 20

@thinkyhead
Copy link
Member

The meaning of jerk and acceleration might slightly differ. Keep adjusting until you find acceptable values that give good results. Don't forget M502, M500 after any re-flash.

@boelle
Copy link
Contributor

boelle commented Feb 20, 2019

@campy is this still an issue if you use bugfix 2.0?

@boelle
Copy link
Contributor

boelle commented Mar 6, 2019

@thinkyhead i think we can close this one

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2020

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 8, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants