-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FR] Rearrange probe order for UBL so it minimizes travel #16950
Comments
UBL tries to probe in concentric circles starting at wherever the probe was when the probing started (usually the center of the bed when |
Or, per the code comments:
|
I would second this. I have my z safe homing point very near where x and y home to so traveling to the center on a 500x500 bed is unnecessary. Also, along with this the G26 test pattern seems to follow the same movement as the probing, and the nozzle loses its prime on the long moves and does not therefore show the first layer height well. Otherwise UBL is really really great! |
I think there might be a middle ground here. Maybe rather than probing points in increasing distance from the origin, which causes the north, west, south and east points to be probed first, followed by the northeast, northwest, southwest, and southeast points; instead pick a starting point on the grid closest to the origin, then do a square "spiral" moving from that center point i.e.. hitting the center point, then north, NW, west, SW, south, SE, east, NE... etc. This will lead to a pattern which is more visually pleasing and with half the travel. |
#21387 was merged. Closing. |
This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
It would be nice to be able to restore a sequential probe sequence in UBL, like when using bilinear bed leveling. Right now it jumps from point to point in a manner that involves a lot of travel. It simply doesn't look very good. I would be curious to know why UBL orders the probe points in such a peculiar way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: