You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be a "nice to have" if there was an end-stop check before G29 (or perhaps starting to print).
Here is my example:
I ran a long print and everything finished. What I did not realize is that the long print caused a wire on the probe switch to break at the solder joint. The switch was now reporting "triggered" rather than "open". So my "Z" MIN and MAX end stops were not both reporting "triggered".
I would think any axis reporting both end-stops as "triggered" would indicate a fault in the printer.
Of course, this would require validation for both physical and soft end-stops so I am not sure if there are cases where both extremes reporting "triggered" might be expected. If there are cases, then perhaps just test for "G29" or similar setup-type operations.
For now, I will add local code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be a "nice to have" if there was an end-stop check before G29 (or perhaps starting to print).
Here is my example:
I would think any axis reporting both end-stops as "triggered" would indicate a fault in the printer.
Of course, this would require validation for both physical and soft end-stops so I am not sure if there are cases where both extremes reporting "triggered" might be expected. If there are cases, then perhaps just test for "G29" or similar setup-type operations.
For now, I will add local code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: