Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pursue Official Packaging and Distribution as ProXPN-CLI #16

Open
3 tasks
MattSurabian opened this issue Nov 7, 2015 · 5 comments
Open
3 tasks

Pursue Official Packaging and Distribution as ProXPN-CLI #16

MattSurabian opened this issue Nov 7, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@MattSurabian
Copy link
Owner

Now that operation of this script can be completely non-interactive and we have an install script, it would be nice for folks to be able to easily install this using system based package managers. Ideally we could pursue:

  • Debian (and by auto-import Ubuntu)
  • Arch (cause that's what I'm running)
  • Homebrew

I'm not opposed to supporting RHEL distros but don't know anything about the packaging process. Are there other package managers we should support?

@MattSurabian
Copy link
Owner Author

In service of the homebrew package: https://github.com/MattSurabian/homebrew-tap

@Pysis868
Copy link
Contributor

NPM? :D
I honestly don't know why there are so many after each OS has their own, but there's another suggestion.

@opuk
Copy link

opuk commented Nov 11, 2015

I made some test packages for Fedora and el7, available at https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/opuk/proxpn-bash-client/

@MattSurabian
Copy link
Owner Author

I very much want to pick up this effort again and think it should be this project's top priority going forward

@MattSurabian
Copy link
Owner Author

I have a working .deb compiled but there are some usability implications I'm working through that could involve a change to repo structure.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants