Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define PSA_WANT_xxx_KEY_PAIR_yyy step 2/DH #7773

Closed
mpg opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7903
Closed

Define PSA_WANT_xxx_KEY_PAIR_yyy step 2/DH #7773

mpg opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7903
Assignees
Labels
enhancement size-s Estimated task size: small (~2d)

Comments

@mpg
Copy link
Contributor

mpg commented Jun 14, 2023

Same as #7771, except for DH, and DH does not have DERIVE, and has not backwards compat concerns, being new in the next release.

Edit: also, since this is the last one in the series:

  • double-check that no KEY_PAIR_LEGACY symbols remains anywhere in the source tree
  • amend ChangeLog.d/Define-PSA_WANT_KEY_TYPE_xxx_KEY_PAIR_yyy.txt to also mention that code size can be saved by disabling GENERATE or DERIVE when they're not needed.

Depends on: #7614.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement size-s Estimated task size: small (~2d)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants