Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Bump MetaMask dependencies #2853

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024
Merged

chore: Bump MetaMask dependencies #2853

merged 11 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

FrederikBolding
Copy link
Member

@FrederikBolding FrederikBolding commented Oct 22, 2024

Bump metamask/utils and other dependencies to the latest version to make use of the performance improvements when validating JSON.

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Oct 25, 2024

@legobeat
Copy link
Contributor

@FrederikBolding FrederikBolding changed the title chore: Bump utils chore: Bump MetaMask dependencies Oct 29, 2024
@FrederikBolding
Copy link
Member Author

@metamaskbot update-pr

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.47%. Comparing base (c497aa6) to head (00b08dc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2853   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.47%   94.47%           
=======================================
  Files         486      486           
  Lines       10367    10367           
  Branches     1582     1582           
=======================================
  Hits         9794     9794           
  Misses        573      573           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@FrederikBolding FrederikBolding merged commit fa31d10 into main Oct 31, 2024
166 checks passed
@FrederikBolding FrederikBolding deleted the fb/bump-utils branch October 31, 2024 10:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants