-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comparison to/thoughts on nixci? #1
Comments
So evaluating disko, nix-ci-build takes for an already build flake 10.929s and nixci uses 1:54.75 minutes for the same flake. This is because it can build and evaluate in parallel (building already starts when the flake is still evaluate). I know that devour-flake is meant to provide caching but if you change a single byte, which is what I do in my project when testing changes, than this cache is no longer effective.
This is my hardware: AX102
|
Also now part of the readme. |
nixci is built on devour-flake and seem similar to what you are trying to accomplish here.
I thought you may find it interesting, like to compare it, or potentially find interesting ideas from it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: