Skip to content

Conversation

@ModerRAS
Copy link
Owner

@ModerRAS ModerRAS commented Nov 3, 2025

本次拉取请求通过引入信号量限制并行处理更新数量、重构更新处理逻辑以更好地管理取消操作和错误日志记录,并确保资源正确释放,从而提升了TelegramBotReceiverService的并发能力和可靠性。

并发性改进

  • 引入SemaphoreSlim_updateProcessingSemaphore)和常量MaxConcurrentUpdates,将并发更新处理任务数限制为8个,避免资源耗尽并提升服务稳定性。[1] [2]

重构与可靠性

  • 通过职责拆分重构更新处理逻辑:HandleUpdateAsync现将处理委派给新的ProcessUpdateAsync方法,该方法负责信号量获取/释放及错误日志记录。这一变更确保更新在并发限制内处理,且即使发生异常也能释放资源。[1] [2]
  • 改进了取消操作处理机制,在更新处理期间遇到关闭请求时检查取消状态并记录相应日志。

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 3, 2025 06:19
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Claude encountered an error —— View job


I'll analyze this and get back to you.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces concurrency control for Telegram bot update processing by implementing a semaphore-based throttling mechanism. The changes ensure that no more than 8 updates are processed simultaneously, preventing resource exhaustion during high-traffic scenarios.

  • Adds a SemaphoreSlim to limit concurrent update processing to 8 updates
  • Refactors HandleUpdateAsync to fire-and-forget processing tasks while respecting cancellation
  • Introduces a new ProcessUpdateAsync method that enforces the semaphore and handles all update processing logic

_botClient = botClient;
_serviceProvider = serviceProvider;
_logger = logger;
_updateProcessingSemaphore = new SemaphoreSlim(MaxConcurrentUpdates, MaxConcurrentUpdates);
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The SemaphoreSlim resource is not being disposed. Since TelegramBotReceiverService inherits from BackgroundService which implements IDisposable, you should override Dispose to properly release the semaphore. Add a Dispose method that calls _updateProcessingSemaphore?.Dispose() to prevent resource leaks.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
}

private async Task ProcessUpdateAsync(Update update, CancellationToken cancellationToken) {
await _updateProcessingSemaphore.WaitAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The WaitAsync call does not pass the cancellationToken parameter. If the service is shutting down, this could cause the semaphore wait to hang indefinitely instead of respecting the cancellation request. Change to await _updateProcessingSemaphore.WaitAsync(cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);

Suggested change
await _updateProcessingSemaphore.WaitAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
await _updateProcessingSemaphore.WaitAsync(cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +52 to +58
var processingTask = ProcessUpdateAsync(update, cancellationToken);

if (cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested) {
return processingTask;
}

_ = processingTask;
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fire-and-forget pattern with _ = processingTask; discards exceptions that occur after HandleUpdateAsync returns, making them unobservable. Consider using Task.Run(() => processingTask) or ensuring exceptions are logged within ProcessUpdateAsync. While line 84 does catch and log exceptions, this pattern could be clearer by documenting the intentional discard or using a more explicit fire-and-forget pattern.

Suggested change
var processingTask = ProcessUpdateAsync(update, cancellationToken);
if (cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested) {
return processingTask;
}
_ = processingTask;
// Fire-and-forget: intentionally not awaiting the task, but ensure exceptions are logged.
var processingTask = ProcessUpdateAsync(update, cancellationToken);
if (cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested) {
return processingTask;
}
Task.Run(() => processingTask).ContinueWith(t => {
if (t.Exception != null) {
_logger.LogError(t.Exception, "Unhandled exception in fire-and-forget update processing for UpdateId {UpdateId}", update.Id);
}
}, TaskContinuationOptions.OnlyOnFaulted);

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +83 to +85
} catch (Exception ex) {
_logger.LogError(ex, "Error handling update {UpdateId}", update.Id);
} finally {
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generic catch clause.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2025

🔍 PR检查报告

📋 检查概览

🧪 测试结果

平台 状态 详情
Ubuntu 🔴 失败 测试结果不可用
Windows 🔴 失败 测试结果不可用

📊 代码质量

  • ✅ 代码格式化检查
  • ✅ 安全漏洞扫描
  • ✅ 依赖包分析
  • ✅ 代码覆盖率收集

📁 测试产物

  • 测试结果文件已上传为artifacts
  • 代码覆盖率已上传到Codecov

🔗 相关链接


此报告由GitHub Actions自动生成

@ModerRAS ModerRAS merged commit c590dd6 into master Nov 3, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@ModerRAS ModerRAS deleted the feature/data-process-enhanced branch November 3, 2025 06:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants