Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Model vs Obs Lat Lon plots of U200 #246

Open
JulioTBacmeister opened this issue May 9, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Model vs Obs Lat Lon plots of U200 #246

JulioTBacmeister opened this issue May 9, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@JulioTBacmeister
Copy link

New feature type

New plot and/or plot enhancement

What is this new feature?

I'd like maps of U200 (Zonal wind at 200 hPa) vs reanalyses - ERA5 or MERRA would be fine.

Assistance required?

Yes, I am requesting a new feature but won't have time to develop it

Extra info

No response

@JulioTBacmeister JulioTBacmeister added the enhancement New feature or request label May 9, 2023
@brianpm
Copy link
Collaborator

brianpm commented May 9, 2023

I recently added monthly mean U from ERA5, and it has 200hPa. So this should be working already, I think. Maybe @justin-richling can check if it actually does work.

@justin-richling
Copy link
Collaborator

Indeed, it does appear that U200 works with the new obs @brianpm put in recently.

@nusbaume
Copy link
Collaborator

nusbaume commented May 9, 2023

@JulioTBacmeister Are you just wanting to compare the zonal winds between CAM and ERA5 at 200 hPa using the U variable from CAM? If so then @brianpm is correct that we already have that functionality.

However, if you are looking specifically for a comparison between the U200 CAM output variable and ERA5 or MERRA then yes, it looks like we'll need to create a new ADF variable defaults entry and obs variable or obs level selection option in order to do so.

@brianpm
Copy link
Collaborator

brianpm commented May 9, 2023

@nusbaume -- That's right, I didn't think about that distinction (U200 in the CAM output vs specifying the 200hPa level with plot_press_levels).

@JulioTBacmeister
Copy link
Author

Thanks. This looks good. I just wanted a comparison of U200 from CAM against any reanalysis. I'm not picky. It would also be nice to add U200 to the exp vs CTL plots.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants