b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.083b

[cecilehannay]

Purpose:
Test new gustiness formulation to align with Redelsperger et al (2000) with alpha = 0x (basically no gustiness)

---

Description:
Same as 78b except use new formulation for gustiness with alpha = 0x

vmag   = max(seq_flux_atmocn_minwind, sqrt( (ubot(n)-us(n))**2 + (vbot(n)-vs(n))**2 + (0.0_R8*ugust(min(rainc(n),6.94444e-4_r8))**2)) )

in shr_flux_mod.F90

---

Case directory:

• Locally (if still available):
  /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.083b

• On github:
  https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.083b

---

Sandbox:

• Locally (if still available): /glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm2_3_alpha16g

• On github: https://github.com/ESCOMP/cesm/tree/cesm2_3_alpha16g

---

Diagnostics:

• Diags (if available):
  https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.083b/

---

Output:

• Raw output on derecho (if still available): /glade/derecho/scratch/hannay/archive/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.083b/
• CAM Climos: /glade/campaign/cgd/amp/amwg/climo/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.083b

---

Contacts:
@cecilehannay, @megandevlan, @swrneale, @PeterHjortLauritzen, @adamrher, @JulioTBacmeister, @gustavo-marques

---

Extra details:

[megandevlan]

@cecilehannay I know this is a bit of an old run now, but would it be possible to extend to 60 years? Hoping to get some more robust ENSO statistics that are comparable with the 1x gust case after talking more with @swrneale today.

[cecilehannay]

@megandevlan: I still have the restart files so it is no problem to extent