We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Purpose: We identified a bug in the physprop files for RRTMGP See: #561 (comment)
physprop
RRTMGP
In atm_in, the rad_climate for M:mam4_mode3 points to:
rad_climate
M:mam4_mode3
mam4_mode3_rrtmg_aeronetdust_sig1.2_dgnl.40_c150219.nc (incorrect)
instead of:
mam4_mode3_rrtmg_aeronetdust_c141106.nc (correct)
The purpose of the run is to check if correcting the bug brings the AODVIS and BURDEN to values similar to what we had in 92.
Description:
Same as 98 (#547) except -user_nl_cam
rad_climate = 'A:Q:H2O', 'N:O2:O2', 'A:CO2:CO2', 'N:ozone:O3', 'A:N2O:N2O', 'A:CH4:CH4', 'N:CFC11STAR:CFC11', 'A:CFC12:CFC12', 'M:mam4_mode1:/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/atm/cam/physprops/mam4_mode1_rrtmg_aeronetdust_sig1.6_dgnh.48_c140304.nc', 'M:mam4_mode2:/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/atm/cam/physprops/mam4_mode2_rrtmg_aitkendust_c141106.nc', 'M:mam4_mode3:/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/atm/cam/physprops/mam4_mode3_rrtmg_aeronetdust_c141106.nc', 'M:mam4_mode4:/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/atm/cam/physprops/mam4_mode4_rrtmg_c130628.nc', 'N:VOLC_MMR1:/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/atm/cam/physprops/volc_camRRTMG_byradius_sigma1.6_mode1_c210211.nc', 'N:VOLC_MMR2:/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/atm/cam/physprops/volc_camRRTMG_byradius_sigma1.6_mode2_c210211.nc', 'N:VOLC_MMR3:/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/atm/cam/physprops/volc_camRRTMG_byradius_sigma1.2_mode3_c210211.nc'
-hybrid run from 98 at yr 201
./xmlchange RUN_REFCASE=b.e23_alpha17f.BLT1850.ne30_t232.098 ./xmlchange RUN_REFDATE=0201-01-01 ./xmlchange RUN_TYPE=hybrid ./xmlchange GET_REFCASE=true ./xmlchange RUN_REFDIR=cesm2_init
Case directory:
Locally (if still available): /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha17f.BLT1850.ne30_t232.100
/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha17f.BLT1850.ne30_t232.100
On github: https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/b.e23_alpha17f.BLT1850.ne30_t232.100
Sandbox:
Locally (if still available): /glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm2_3_alpha17f
/glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm2_3_alpha17f
On github: https://github.com/ESCOMP/cesm/tree/cesm2_3_alpha17f
Diagnostics:
Output:
/glade/derecho/scratch/hannay/archive/b.e23_alpha17f.BLT1850.ne30_t232.100/
/glade/campaign/cgd/amp/amwg/climo/b.e23_alpha17f.BLT1850.ne30_t232.100
Contacts: @cecilehannay, @PeterHjortLauritzen, @adamrher, @brianpm, @JulioTBacmeister, @swrneale, @bstephens82, @gustavo-marques, @fobryan3, @klindsay28, @dabail10, @wwieder, @slevis-lmwg, @olyson @tilmes, @fvitt @@dlawrenncar
Extra details:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Purpose:
We identified a bug in the
physprop
files forRRTMGP
See: #561 (comment)In atm_in, the
rad_climate
forM:mam4_mode3
points to:instead of:
The purpose of the run is to check if correcting the bug brings the AODVIS and BURDEN to values similar to what we had in 92.
Description:
Same as 98 (#547) except
-user_nl_cam
-hybrid run from 98 at yr 201
Case directory:
Locally (if still available):
/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha17f.BLT1850.ne30_t232.100
On github:
https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/b.e23_alpha17f.BLT1850.ne30_t232.100
Sandbox:
Locally (if still available):
/glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm2_3_alpha17f
On github: https://github.com/ESCOMP/cesm/tree/cesm2_3_alpha17f
Diagnostics:
https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha17f.BLT1850.ne30_t232.100/
Output:
/glade/derecho/scratch/hannay/archive/b.e23_alpha17f.BLT1850.ne30_t232.100/
/glade/campaign/cgd/amp/amwg/climo/b.e23_alpha17f.BLT1850.ne30_t232.100
Contacts:
@cecilehannay, @PeterHjortLauritzen, @adamrher, @brianpm, @JulioTBacmeister, @swrneale, @bstephens82,
@gustavo-marques, @fobryan3, @klindsay28,
@dabail10,
@wwieder, @slevis-lmwg, @olyson
@tilmes, @fvitt
@@dlawrenncar
Extra details:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: