You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To do the follow-up work summarised under the heading 'Context and plan/proposal for follow-on work' in #300 (comment), i.e:
... such methods are more efficiently daskified by conversion to using the existing Dask built-in equivalents instead of calling func this way.
So the plan is to use follow-on PRs to convert from use of func to the appropriate built-in in each method. It turns out there are Dask built-ins for every one listed above available for us to use directly.
Methods to convert
the eight trigonometric and hyperbolic methods and their inverses which don't have restricted domains (all except arccos, arcsin, arctanh and arccosh);
ceil;
exp;
floor;
rint;
round;
trunc;
log.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To do the follow-up work summarised under the heading 'Context and plan/proposal for follow-on work' in #300 (comment), i.e:
Methods to convert
arccos
,arcsin
,arctanh
andarccosh
);ceil
;exp
;floor
;rint
;round
;trunc
;log
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: