Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

X - decreases Y - decreases Z != X decreases Z #762

Open
TranslatorIssueCreator opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

X - decreases Y - decreases Z != X decreases Z #762

TranslatorIssueCreator opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@TranslatorIssueCreator
Copy link

Type: Bug Report

URL: https://ui.test.transltr.io/main/results?l=Lepirudin&i=PUBCHEM.COMPOUND:118856773&t=4&r=0&q=9c30d7a5-be5f-4f44-a12e-376369954f57

ARS PK: 0951aef6-f1a0-4061-9a45-66a6d94767ef

Steps to reproduce:

What genes may be downregulated by:Lepirudin
as 1 example search for TNFRSF1A

Screenshots:

@sandrine-muller-research
Copy link
Collaborator

sandrine-muller-research commented Apr 17, 2024

A lot of top answers show the same similar reasoning chain that is not answering the question asked:
GENE X (output/answer) upregulates GENE Y (intermediate node) Has decreased activity or abundance of Lepirudin.
As an example, for TNFRSF1A:
image

see complete list in test asset sheet.
To note that I did not put TNFRSF1A as a never_show because there is other (weak though) evidence of another correct reasoning path.

@sandrine-muller-research sandrine-muller-research added the test asset to designate an issue that has been added to the acceptance testing asset sheet label Apr 17, 2024
@sandrine-muller-research
Copy link
Collaborator

sandrine-muller-research commented Apr 17, 2024

Perhaps related to issue #755 but the involved ARA here is BTE.

@sandrine-muller-research
Copy link
Collaborator

This type of reasoning overloads the top results : this could be an issue for O&O as well.

@sierra-moxon sierra-moxon added needs review this ticket needs a broad group of people to review and assign next steps because it crosses teams opposite of what I asked for and removed test asset to designate an issue that has been added to the acceptance testing asset sheet labels May 16, 2024
@sierra-moxon sierra-moxon changed the title bad reasoning outputs for MVP2 X - decreases Y - decreases Z != X decreases Z May 16, 2024
@sierra-moxon sierra-moxon added retest needed and removed needs review this ticket needs a broad group of people to review and assign next steps because it crosses teams labels Jul 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants